There are so many factors in having buildings and establishment to be constructed or renovated. You would need enough manpower, finances, legalities, location planning, marketing or fundraising, maintenance, endowments, and feasibility studies. There are so many things to consider in order to reach the construction goal for whatever reason an organization, company, or agency might have.
Having this process executed would most likely need both art and science. A church capital campaign has a need of a mix of modern and traditional processes and methods in order for it to be established. The way this works is through fund raising so that there would be enough finances for the construction of the church within a specified time.
There are differences between this and other campaigns like in schools, universities, hospitals, museums, etc. The process is different and is strongly revolved around the Christian Stewardship principle. It is built on its foundation which is a lifestyle that came from the responsibilities and priorities of their values from the word of God.
But of course, this highly depends on the way the procedures are being executed, whether in a timely and well calculated manner or not. The givers have the most important role and the success and the time this takes would depend greatly on their decisions. Some would straight away offer their support while some would take a lot of time in order to decide after thorough thinking and praying.
There are a few mistakes that would be encountered during these phases. The committee needs to be equipped with a feasibility study or a congregational readiness survey in order to make a comprehensive plan in what essential elements that is needed. This is a project that is too important for anyone to apply blind faith on.
Going out on public too soon would be another mistake that some campaigns would usually make. It so happens that during the publicized phase, the amount of donations does not contribute enough to the whole project and would only be minimal. That is why there needs to be private meetings with members and high contributing people.
The campaign should be seen through and through. Some would think that the publicity is the determining factor of how the project will be a success of failure but it actually depends on the first and end phase of it. The security you get from the beginning would push through the campaign, while the end certifies loyalty from members and supporters.
There is no valid certainty that the support and assistance that would be given is one hundred percent from the members of the church. This is why the committee should never make assumptions based on this and most likely lead to miscalculations. The risk is not worth it, so there needs to be additional planning for these situations or cases.
Hiring a consultant would be able to provide professional input and output. Since this is a more complex campaign compared to others, it needs closer attention and critical importance for everything to be put in place. There are a lot at stake for this, so churches need to decide on choosing to retain firm that would be able to assist them further.
Having this process executed would most likely need both art and science. A church capital campaign has a need of a mix of modern and traditional processes and methods in order for it to be established. The way this works is through fund raising so that there would be enough finances for the construction of the church within a specified time.
There are differences between this and other campaigns like in schools, universities, hospitals, museums, etc. The process is different and is strongly revolved around the Christian Stewardship principle. It is built on its foundation which is a lifestyle that came from the responsibilities and priorities of their values from the word of God.
But of course, this highly depends on the way the procedures are being executed, whether in a timely and well calculated manner or not. The givers have the most important role and the success and the time this takes would depend greatly on their decisions. Some would straight away offer their support while some would take a lot of time in order to decide after thorough thinking and praying.
There are a few mistakes that would be encountered during these phases. The committee needs to be equipped with a feasibility study or a congregational readiness survey in order to make a comprehensive plan in what essential elements that is needed. This is a project that is too important for anyone to apply blind faith on.
Going out on public too soon would be another mistake that some campaigns would usually make. It so happens that during the publicized phase, the amount of donations does not contribute enough to the whole project and would only be minimal. That is why there needs to be private meetings with members and high contributing people.
The campaign should be seen through and through. Some would think that the publicity is the determining factor of how the project will be a success of failure but it actually depends on the first and end phase of it. The security you get from the beginning would push through the campaign, while the end certifies loyalty from members and supporters.
There is no valid certainty that the support and assistance that would be given is one hundred percent from the members of the church. This is why the committee should never make assumptions based on this and most likely lead to miscalculations. The risk is not worth it, so there needs to be additional planning for these situations or cases.
Hiring a consultant would be able to provide professional input and output. Since this is a more complex campaign compared to others, it needs closer attention and critical importance for everything to be put in place. There are a lot at stake for this, so churches need to decide on choosing to retain firm that would be able to assist them further.
Post a Comment